July 2014 | NTIA Technical Report TR-14-506
Geoffrey A. Sanders; John E. Carroll; Frank H. Sanders; Robert L. Sole
Abstract: In response to proposals to introduce new radio systems into 3.5 GHz radio spectrum in the United States, the authors have performed measurements and analysis on effects of interference, from a variety of radar waveforms, to the performance of a prototype 3.5 GHz Long Term Evolution (LTE) network, consisting of one base station (an eNodeB) and one client (referred to as user equipment or UE) utilizing frequency-division duplexing (FDD). This work has been prompted by the possibility that LTE receivers may eventually share spectrum with radar operations in this spectrum range. Radar pulse parameters used in this testing spanned the range of both existing and anticipated future radar systems in the 3.5 GHz spectrum range. Effects of radar interference on the LTE uplink and downlink throughput, block error rate (BLER), and modulation coding scheme (MCS) were measured. Additionally, for the uplink tests, resource block (RB) usage and UE transmit power were recorded. Effects on LTE performance are presented as a function of radar pulse parameters and the incident power level of radar pulses into the LTE receivers. The authors do not determine the interference protection criterion for LTE networks. Rather, the data presented can be used by spectrum managers and engineers as a building block in the construction of band sharing criteria for radar transmitters and LTE receivers, supporting possible future spectrum sharing at 3.5 GHz.
Keywords: radar; spectrum sharing; chirped pulses; block error rate (BLER); Long Term Evolution (LTE); P0N pulses; frequency-division duplexing (FDD); evolved-Node B (eNB); Q3N pulses
For technical information concerning this report, contact:
Geoffrey A. Sanders
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, components, and software may be identified in this report to specify adequately the technical aspects of the reported results. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, nor does it imply that the equipment or software identified is necessarily the best available for the particular application or uses.