Journal of Imaging, 6, no. 3 (February 2020)
Study of Subjective Data Integrity for Image Quality Data Sets with Consumer Camera Content
doi: 10.3390/jimaging6030007Cite This Publication
Jakub Nawala, Margaret H. Pinson, Mikolaj Leszczuk, and Lucjan Janowski, “Study of Subjective Data Integrity for Image Quality Data Sets with Consumer Camera Content,” Journal of Imaging 6, no. 3 (February 2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging6030007
Jakub Nawala, Margaret H. Pinson , Mikolaj Leszczuk, and Lucjan Janowski
Abstract: We need data sets of images and subjective scores to develop robust no reference (or blind) visual quality metrics for consumer applications. These applications have many uncontrolled variables because the camera creates the original media and the impairment simultaneously. We do not fully understand how this impacts the integrity of our subjective data. We put forward two new data sets of images from consumer cameras. The first data set, CCRIQ2, uses a strict experiment design, more suitable for camera performance evaluation. The second data set, VIME1, uses a loose experiment design that resembles the behavior of consumer photographers. We gather subjective scores through a subjective experiment with 24 participants using the Absolute Category Rating method. We make these two new data sets available royalty-free on the Consumer Digital Video Library. We also present their integrity analysis (proposing one new approach) and explore the possibility of combining CCRIQ2 with its legacy counterpart. We conclude that the loose experiment design yields unreliable data, despite adhering to international recommendations. This suggests that the classical subjective study design may not be suitable for studies using consumer content. Finally, we show that Hoßfeld–Schatz–Egger α failed to detect important differences between the two data sets.
Keywords: image quality; subjective test; no reference (NR) metric; data integrity; consumer camera; blind quality assessment
For technical information concerning this report, contact:
Margaret H. Pinson
Institute for Telecommunication Sciences
(303) 497-3579
mpinson@ntia.doc.gov
Disclaimer: Certain commercial equipment, components, and software may be identified in this report to specify adequately the technical aspects of the reported results. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, nor does it imply that the equipment or software identified is necessarily the best available for the particular application or uses.
For questions or information on this or any other NTIA scientific publication, contact the ITS Publications Office at ITSinfo@ntia.gov or 303-497-3572.